Time matters more than timing
The single biggest lever in building wealth is not picking the right stock or catching the right moment — it is the number of years your money stays invested. Compound growth is exponential, which means the gap between someone who starts at 25 and someone who starts at 35 is far wider than ten years of contributions would suggest.
A 25-year-old investing $300 a month at a 7% average return reaches roughly $719,000 by age 65. The same person starting at 35 ends up near $340,000 — less than half — despite contributing only ten years less. The missing decade is the decade when their earliest dollars would have done the most compounding.
The practical takeaway is uncomfortable but freeing: you do not need a large income or perfect market timing to end up wealthy. You need to start early, automate the contributions, and resist the urge to interrupt the process. Boring consistency beats brilliant timing almost every time.